Anonymous and the global correction

ALJAZEERA

A loosely organized group of hackers has been targeting oppressive regimes and has said this is just the beginning.

The tendency to relate past events to what is possible in the present becomes more difficult as the scope of the geopolitical environment changes. It is a useful thing, then, to ask every once in a while if the environment has recently undergone any particular severe changes, thereby expanding our options for the future.

Terminology, let alone our means of exchanging information, has changed to such a degree that many essential discussions in today’s “communications age” would be entirely incomprehensible to many two decades ago.

As the social, political and technological environment has developed, some have already begun to explore new options, seizing new chances for digital activism – and more will soon join in. It is time for the rest of the world to understand why.

Service denied

When a release by WikiLeaks revealed the depravity of just how corrupt and horrid the Tunisian government really was, it prompted Tunisians to step up active dissent and take to the streets en masse for the first time.

In response, a loose network of participants within the international Anonymous protest organisation attacked non-essential government websites – those not providing direct services to Tunisians – at the prompting of our contacts.

Several such sites were replaced with a message of support to the Tunisian people, while others were pushed offline via distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks, involving thousands of computer users who request large amounts of data from a website simultaneously, overwhelming it.

Other assistance programmes followed, even after the deposed Ben Ali fled the nation that reviled him, with Anonymous and other parties working with Tunisians – both in-country and abroad – to provide the nation’s people with the tools and information resources they needed to begin building up new, reasonable political institutions capable of ensuring a freer civic life.

Our “Guide to Protecting the Tunisian Revolution” series – a collaboration between hundreds of veterans of traditional revolutionary movements as well as practitioners of “new activism” – were disseminated both online and in print; aside from tips on safety during confrontation and the like, these also explain how to establish secure yet accessible networks and communications for Tunisians, as well as instructions on establishing neighbourhood syndicates capable of uniting in common cause.

Already, such organisations are being established across Tunisia, just as they will be established elsewhere as the movement proceeds.
Continue reading →

Posted in SOLUTIONS | Leave a comment

Russ Feingold Launches ‘Progressives United’ To Combat Corporate Influences In Politics

By Amanda Terkel
HUFFINGTON POST

Things were like this 100 years ago in the United States, with the huge corporate and business power of the oil companies and others. But this time it’s like the Gilded Age on steroids.

WASHINGTON — When some senators retire, they decide to take lucrative lobbying jobs. Others go straight to Wall Street. But Wisconsin Democrat Russ Feingold, who lost his re-election bid in November, is continuing on his principled — and often lonely — path by starting an organization to combat corporate influence in politics, an effort he hopes will spark “a new progressive movement” that will truly hold elected officials accountable.

Launching on Wednesday, Progressives United is an attempt to to build a grassroots effort aimed at mitigating the effects of, and eventually overturning, the Supreme Court’s infamous Citizens United decision that opened the floodgates to corporate spending in the U.S. electoral system. In addition to online mobilization, the political action committee (PAC) will support progressive candidates at the local, state and national levels, as well as holding the media and elected officials accountable on the group’s key priorities.

“In my view — and the view of many people — it’s one of the most lawless decisions in the history of our country,” said Feingold of Citizens United in an interview with The Huffington Post. “The idea of allowing corporations to have unlimited influence on our democracy is very dangerous, obviously. That’s exactly what it does … Things were like this 100 years ago in the United States, with the huge corporate and business power of the oil companies and others. But this time it’s like the Gilded Age on steroids.”
Continue reading →

Posted in CAPITALISM, DEMOCRACY, GOVERNMENT, POLICY, SOLUTIONS | Leave a comment

When Democracy Weakens

By Bob Herbert
The New York Times

So what we get in this democracy of ours are astounding and increasingly obscene tax breaks and other windfall benefits for the wealthiest, while the bought-and-paid-for politicians hack away at essential public services and the social safety net, saying we can’t afford them.

As the throngs celebrated in Cairo, I couldn’t help wondering about what is happening to democracy here in the United States. I think it’s on the ropes. We’re in serious danger of becoming a democracy in name only.

While millions of ordinary Americans are struggling with unemployment and declining standards of living, the levers of real power have been all but completely commandeered by the financial and corporate elite. It doesn’t really matter what ordinary people want. The wealthy call the tune, and the politicians dance.

So what we get in this democracy of ours are astounding and increasingly obscene tax breaks and other windfall benefits for the wealthiest, while the bought-and-paid-for politicians hack away at essential public services and the social safety net, saying we can’t afford them. One state after another is reporting that it cannot pay its bills. Public employees across the country are walking the plank by the tens of thousands. Camden, N.J., a stricken city with a serious crime problem, laid off nearly half of its police force. Medicaid, the program that provides health benefits to the poor, is under savage assault from nearly all quarters.

The poor, who are suffering from an all-out depression, are never heard from. In terms of their clout, they might as well not exist. The Obama forces reportedly want to raise a billion dollars or more for the president’s re-election bid. Politicians in search of that kind of cash won’t be talking much about the wants and needs of the poor. They’ll be genuflecting before the very rich.
Continue reading →

Posted in CAPITALISM, DEMOCRACY, GOVERNMENT, POLICY | Leave a comment

Obama’s Big Budget Cut Proposals Target The Poor

By Arthur Delaney
HUFFINGTON POST

WASHINGTON — As Democrats and Republicans wrangle over fiscal austerity and the shape of the 2012 federal budget, the White House is targeting programs in the $4 trillion budget that benefit low-income Americans.

It’s a sop to moderates and conservatives, and it’s likely to infuriate voters who put President Barack Obama in the White House.

In the past week, the Obama administration has signaled that it will propose significant cuts to community service block grants and an energy assistance program that helps poor people stay warm in the winter and cool in the summer.

A White House source familiar with the budget process told HuffPost that the president will propose cutting $2.5 billion from the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program, or LIHEAP, which received $5.1 billion in federal funds in 2009. That program distributes money to states, which then distribute it to social service agencies to help families heat or cool their homes.
Continue reading →

Posted in CAPITALISM, DEMOCRACY, ECONOMY, EDUCATION, EMPLOYMENT, POLICY, RESOURCES | Leave a comment

For-Profit College Recruiters Taught To Use ‘Pain,’ ‘Fear,’ Internal Documents Show

By Chris Kirkham
Huffington Post

Newly-released internal training documents from several for-profit colleges illustrate a culture that encourages recruiters to increase enrollment by focusing on emotions such as “pain” and “fear” to attract low-income students who are struggling with adverse personal and financial circumstances.

The documents, obtained by a Senate oversight committee, shed light on the high-pressure recruiting tactics employed by some for-profit schools to increase enrollment numbers and the profits that come from federal student-aid dollars.

“Remind them of what things will be like if they don’t continue forward and earn their degrees,” reads one document obtained from ITT Technical Institute, a for-profit school with more than 100 campuses across the country. “Poke the pain a bit and remind them who else is depending on them and their commitment to a better future.”

The Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee has conducted a series of hearings probing the for-profit education sector during the past year. Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa), who chairs the committee, referenced the documents in a Monday-evening speech on the Senate floor.

For-profit colleges are facing increased scrutiny and new regulations amid growing evidence of aggressive and deceptive recruiting tactics and a disproportionate number of students defaulting on federal loans. Critics of the industry have pointed to the tremendous amounts of money such schools spend on marketing and recruiting in order to get more students — and their federal aid funds — in the door.

Harkin’s committee has requested a series of internal training documents from numerous for-profit schools. Among the more eye-opening materials turned over to the committee were training guides from ITT and Kaplan University, which is owned by The Washington Post Co. (Read our look at Kaplan’s questionable tactics here.)

The ITT training documents laid out a “Pain Funnel and Pain Puzzle” that describes a series of questions recruiters should ask prospective students in order to “poke the pain” and convince them to sign up for classes. “Level 1 Pain” questions focus on telling the story of a student’s performance in high school or in getting a GED.

The recruiter is then instructed to continue probing, asking questions such as “What has not having a college education cost you?” and “What are you willing to change now, or have you given up trying to deal with the problem?”

A similar document from Kaplan University encourages recruiters to “Keep digging until you uncover their pain, fears and dreams” and to “Get to their emotions and you will create the urgency!”

The internal training guides shed light on recruitment methods that have long been criticized by student-advocacy groups as preying on uninformed, uneducated students who may have little chance of success once admitted to the schools.

A Kaplan spokeswoman said the company discontinued the recruiting guide mentioning “pain” and “fear” last year. She pointed to a new company policy that allows students to withdraw free of charge within four or five weeks if they are not satisfied with the program

“When students are enrolled through deception or fear, they are less prepared to meet the challenges of college,” Harkin said Monday evening on the Senate floor. “Rather than offering students a better life, these types of strong-arm, emotionally abusive tactics are all too typical of schools that have little or no interest in providing students the academic help and support they need for the students to succeed.”

A Senate report released last year found extremely high turnover rates for students in the for-profit sector: 57 percent of students had withdrawn within a year, according to an analysis of students at 16 large for-profit schools between July 2008 and June 2009.

A document obtained from a privately owned for-profit school, Vatterott Educational Centers Inc. noted that, “We deal with people that live in the moment and for the moment. Their decision to start, stay in school or quit school is based more on emotion than logic. Pain is the greater motivator in the short term.”

Another Vatterott document described the target market for recruiters: “We serve the UN-DER world, Unemployed, Underpaid, Unsatisfied, Unskilled, Unprepared, Unsupported, Unmotivated, Unhappy, Underserved!”

Officials at ITT and Vatterott did not respond to requests for comment Tuesday afternoon.

Students at for-profit schools represent less than 15 percent of college enrollments nationwide, but take in a quarter of federal student-aid dollars and account for nearly half of all student loan defaults, according to data released last week by the Department of Education. A quarter of all students enrolled at for-profit schools defaulted on student loans within three years — more than twice the rate of students at public nonprofit colleges.

Numerous corporations that own for-profit colleges — including the Apollo Group, which owns University of Phoenix, and Corinthian Colleges Inc., which runs the Everest College chain — derive more than 85 percent of their revenue from federal student aid.

Read the “Pain Funnel” page from an ITT Tech training manual and read the full documents from the floor speech below:

Below, the “Kaplan document”:

And the Vatterrott College document, detailing sales targets:

Posted in CAPITALISM, EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT, POLICY | Leave a comment

Ewwwwwwww … Anyone Else Feeling the Need for a Shower?

AOL’s Tricky HuffPo Marriage

by Dan Lyons

It is no surprise that AOL is buying Huffington Post. Last summer I spent some time with Arianna Huffington and her team as I was preparing a profile for Newsweek and even then it was clear that they wanted to sell the company. Huffington and her partner Ken Lerer had raised $37 million in venture funding, much of it from Softbank Capital. In June 2009, as Softbank grew impatient for a return, the VC fund had installed Eric Hippeau, one of its partners, as CEO of Huffington Post. In our conversations, Hippeau talked about how he was determined to build a “strong and independent” business—which in the world of tech and media is code for, “We’re for sale.” Now, sure enough, as soon as the deal with AOL was announced, Hippeau announced he was skipping out to join Lerer’s investment firm. In other words: My work here is done, people.

No doubt Hippeau and Lerer and Huffington were drinking champagne last night, but the truth is, this deal is not a victory for either side. It’s a slow-motion train wreck and will end in disaster.

Listen to Nick Denton, who runs Gawker, which now becomes the biggest independent Web-based news outlet. “I’m disappointed in the Huffington Post. I thought Arianna Huffington and Kenny Lerer were reinventing news, rather than simply flipping to a flailing conglomerate,” he told me.

Denton insists he has no intention of ever selling Gawker, and he seems not-so-secretly pleased to see his opponents cashing out: “AOL has gathered so many of our rivals— Huffington Post, Engadget, Techcrunch—in one place. The question: Is this a fearsome Internet conglomerate or simply a roach motel for once lively websites?”

Continue reading →

Posted in CAPITALISM, Ewwwwwwww, NEWS | Leave a comment

Buddhist Economics: Raj Patel Suggests a New Way to Define Value

Posted in CAPITALISM, ECONOMY, SOLUTIONS | Leave a comment

23 Things They Don’t Tell You About Capitalism: Item #1 — There’s No Such Thing as a Free Market

23 Things They Don’t Tell You About Capitalism: Item #1 — There’s No Such Thing as a Free Market, Don Hazen, Alternet, January 31, 2011

Author Ha-Joon Chang dismisses the idea that any capitalist market is free and questions whether it can ever really be fair.

Many books have tackled the great recession of 2008, the second worst economic crisis in history, after the depression. But I doubt there is one book, written in response to the current economic crisis, that is as fun or easy to read as Ha-Joon Chang’s 23 Things They Don’t Tell you About Capitalism. I’d never heard of this Korean economist, probably because he lives in England and teaches at Cambridge, but he is well known in economic circles, and well respected.

It is no secret that the American society is dominated by the super rich, held for hostage by the banks, dominated in the Nation’s Capital by the tens of thousands of lobbyists and their big bucks, as the Republican party and their corporate Tea Partyists provide cover for giant theft of many billions of wealth for the very rich, with of course the cooperation of the Democrats who supported the extension of the Bush tax cuts for the very wealthy (Check out Rachel Maddow’s op-ed, which explains why Dwight Eisenhower, who taxed the rich to balance the budget, which be a radical in today’s political reality). In this very discouraging environment it is hard to imagine scenarios where normal folks, every day voters, the non-rich, who are not represented by lobbyists, can have much influence.

On top of that, making change even harder, is an enormously effective propaganda system that perpetuates inaccurate and often destructive myths about virtually every element of capitalism and the US and global economy. And top economic officials in the Obama administration and leading mainstream economists often perpetuate these myths, and the corporate media marches along side repeating them like the gospel.

So, as far as I am concerned there never can be too much truth-telling to attempt to pull away the curtain of propaganda and disinformation that shrouds our economic thinking and actions. I am not under the illusion that the facts will set us free. As research has shown, when people connect their opinions to a set of values or leaders, they will not be open to changing their mind, and presentation of contrary “facts,” may make them dig in more clinging their their misinformation. But when it comes to the economy, the propaganda system has been so pervasive, and supported by conventional wisdom that people who need to know better, buy into it, and yes that includes liberals and progressives who have a kind of inertia of the mind of their own. It is hard to change one’s sense of things.

AlterNet’s Economics editor Joshua Holland made a nice contribution to this public education effort this Fall with his book: The Fifteen Biggest Lies about the Economy Now we have the funny, and sharp Chang. What follows is chapter one of his book: “There is No Such Thing as a Free Market.” Other chapters are quite revealing such as: ” The Washing Machine Has Changed the World More than the Internet;” “More Education, in Itself, Is Not Going to Make a Country Richer;” “The U.S. Does Not Have the Highest Living Standard in the World;” “Companies Should Not Be Run in the Interest of their Owners.”

Chan’s main point is the recent economic disaster wasn’t by accident, that active government can promote economic dynamism, that tax cuts for the rich simply redistribute wealth upward, and that we will continue on the path to economic disaster,with no end in sight, unless the collective wisdom, goes in a different direction.

— AlterNet Executive Editor Don Hazen

Posted in CAPITALISM | Leave a comment

The hidden roots of Egypt’s despair

By Danny Schechter
Al Jazeera


The economic crisis is driving political protests sparked in part by US financial speculation.

The question is, why aren’t Americans up in arms too as inflation at the pump and the grocery store drives prices higher here?

This is an upstairs/downstairs story that takes us from the peak of a Western mountaintop for the wealthy to spreading mass despair in the valleys of the Third World poor.

It is about how the solutions for the world financial crisis that the CEOs and Big pols are massaging in a posh conference centre in snowy Davos, Switzerland have turned into a global economic catastrophe in the streets of Cairo, the current ground zero of a certain-to-spread wave of international unrest.

Yes, the tens of thousands in the streets demanding the ouster of the cruel Mubarak regime are pressing for their right to make a political choice, but they are being driven by an economic disaster that have sent unemployment skyrocketing and food prices climbing.

People are out in the streets not just to meet but by their need to eat.

As Nouriel Roubini – who was among the first to predict the financial crisis while others were pooh-poohing him as “Dr Doom” – says, don’t just look at the crowds in Cairo, but what is motivating them now after years of silence and repression.

He says that the dramatic rise in energy and food prices has become a major global threat and a leading factor that has gone largely unreported in the coverage of events in Egypt.

“What has happened in Tunisia is happening right now in Egypt, but also riots in Morocco, Algeria and Pakistan are related not only to high unemployment rates and to income and wealth inequality, but also to this very sharp rise in food and commodity prices,” Roubini said.

For instance, prices in Egypt are up 17% because of a worldwide surge in commodity prices.

Now here’s a key fact buried in a CNN Money report – the kind intended for investors, not the public at large: “About 40% of Egypt’s citizens live off less than $2 a day, so any price increase hurts.”

Think about that: what would you be doing if you were living off $2 a day? You won’t be drinking mochaccinos at Starbucks, that’s for sure.

Trust me, the people on top are following this unrest closely on Wall Street as anxiety grows. Reports the Washington Post:

US stocks declined sharply Friday as violent clashes in Egypt injected a jolt of anxiety into global financial markets.

Egypt is central to US interests in the Middle East as a moderate state and a key player in both counter-terrorism operations and regional peace negotiations, said Helima L. Croft, a geopolitical analyst at Barclays Capital.

If street protests were to end president Hosni Mubarak’s nearly 30-year hold on power, “I think there would be a fear that you could see radicalism sweeping across the Middle East,” Croft said, adding that the fear might be unfounded.

Beyond its political significance, Egypt controls the Suez Canal, an important shipping lane.

Suddenly, there are worries about Egypt not being able to pay off its debt, and suddenly was pronounced riskier than Iraq, according to Bloomberg:

The cost of protecting Egyptian debt against default for five years with the contracts jumped 69 basis points, or 0.69 per cent points, this week to 375 today, compared with 328 for Iraq, according to prices from CMA, a data provider in London. Just last week, Iraqi swaps cost 19 basis points more than Egypt’s, and in June, an average 240 basis points more, as Iraq recovered from the US-led invasion in 2003.

The unrest, inspired by the revolt that toppled Tunisia’s leader, “does raise political risks,” said Eric Fine, a portfolio manager in New York who helps Van Eck Associates Corp. oversee $3 billion in emerging-market assets. “If this is a revolution, the price of risk for Egypt could go much higher, and if it’s a failed one” the cost will drop to 300 basis points and probably 250, Fine said in a phone interview.

While most of the increases in food prices are due to droughts and floods, US policy contributed to it mightily, argues Mike “Mish” Shedlock on his global economic blog, revealing a reality the media has missed:

Bernanke’s “Quantitative Easing” policies combined with rampant credit growth in China and India has led to increased speculation in commodities. That speculation has forced up food prices.

Please note that speculation in commodities is not a cause of anything. Rather commodity speculation is a result of piss poor monetary policies not only the Fed, but central bankers worldwide.

The financiers schmoozing at the World Economic Forum in Davos know all about this and are worried as well, as Bloomberg News reported:

“This protest won’t end in North Africa; it will spread in many countries because of high unemployment and increasing food prices,” Hamza Alkholi, chairman and chief executive of Saudi Alkholi Group, a holding company investing in industrials and real estate, said in an interview in Davos, Switzerland.

In an age of globalisation, a hike in global prices will spread unrest globally. Egypt had its own “bread riot” in 1977 when prices went up suddenly on the orders of the World Bank, so it is no stranger to the need to fight back.

The question is, why aren’t Americans up in arms too as inflation at the pump and the grocery store drives prices higher here? Part of the reason is that they don’t know that the US has worse economic inequality according to a scientific measure: The Gini Coefficient.

Washington’s Blog reports, “According to the CIA World Fact Book: the US is ranked as the 42nd most unequal country in the world, with a Gini Coefficient of 45. [In contrast] Egypt is ranked as the 90th most unequal country, with a Gini Coefficient of around 34.4.”

He asks, “so why are Egyptians rioting, while the Americans are complacent?”

According to the report, Building a Better America (PDF), Dan Ariely of Duke University and Michael I. Norton of Harvard Business School show that Americans appear to “drastically underestimate the current level of wealth inequality”.

And why is that? Could our media have anything to do with it – a media consumed with ‘when it bleeds it leads’, but where context and background are missing?

Danny Schechter blogs for Mediachannel.org (Newsdissector.com/blog) His new film Plunder views the financial crisis as a crime story. (Plunderthecrimeofourtime.com)

The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera’s editorial policy.

Posted in CAPITALISM, DEMOCRACY, GLOBALIZATION, INTERNATIONAL | Leave a comment

The Organic Elite Surrenders to Monsanto: What Now?

By Ronnie Cummins
Organic Consumers Association, Jan 27, 2011

“The policy set for GE alfalfa will most likely guide policies for other GE crops as well. True coexistence is a must.”   –  Whole Foods Market, Jan. 21, 2011

In the wake of a 12-year battle to keep Monsanto’s Genetically Engineered (GE) crops from contaminating the nation’s 25,000 organic farms and ranches, America’s organic consumers and producers are facing betrayal. A self-appointed cabal of the Organic Elite, spearheaded by Whole Foods Market, Organic Valley, and Stonyfield Farm, has decided it’s time to surrender to Monsanto. Top executives from these companies have publicly admitted that they no longer oppose the mass commercialization of GE crops, such as Monsanto’s controversial Roundup Ready alfalfa, and are prepared to sit down and cut a deal for “coexistence” with Monsanto and USDA biotech cheerleader Tom Vilsack.

In a cleverly worded, but profoundly misleading email sent to its customers last week, Whole Foods Market, while proclaiming their support for organics and “seed purity,” gave the green light to USDA bureaucrats to approve the “conditional deregulation” of Monsanto’s genetically engineered, herbicide-resistant alfalfa.  Beyond the regulatory euphemism of “conditional deregulation,” this means that WFM and their colleagues are willing to go along with the massive planting of a chemical and energy-intensive GE perennial crop, alfalfa; guaranteed to spread its mutant genes and seeds across the nation; guaranteed to contaminate the alfalfa fed to organic animals; guaranteed to lead to massive poisoning of farm workers and destruction of the essential soil food web by the toxic herbicide, Roundup; and guaranteed to produce Roundup-resistant superweeds that will require even more deadly herbicides such as 2,4 D to be sprayed on millions of acres of alfalfa across the U.S.

In exchange for allowing Monsanto’s premeditated pollution of the alfalfa gene pool, WFM wants “compensation.” In exchange for a new assault on farmworkers and rural communities (a recent large-scale Swedish study found that spraying Roundup doubles farm workers’ and rural residents’ risk of getting cancer), WFM expects the pro-biotech USDA to begin to regulate rather than cheerlead for Monsanto. In payment for a new broad spectrum attack on the soil’s crucial ability to provide nutrition for food crops and to sequester dangerous greenhouse gases (recent studies show that Roundup devastates essential soil microorganisms that provide plant nutrition and sequester climate-destabilizing greenhouse gases), WFM wants the Biotech Bully of St. Louis to agree to pay “compensation” (i.e. hush money) to farmers “for any losses related to the contamination of his crop.”

Continue reading →

Posted in CAPITALISM, CONSUMERISM, ENVIRONMENT, GLOBALIZATION, Health | Leave a comment